Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Farm Hosp ; 47(2): T55-T63, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2288271

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a threat to hospital capacity due to the high number of admissions, which has led to the development of various strategies to release and create new hospital beds. Due to the importance of systemic corticosteroids in this disease, we assessed their efficacy in reducing the length of stay (LOS) in hospitals and compared the effect of 3 different corticosteroids on this outcome. MéTHOD: We conducted a real-world, controlled, retrospective cohort study that analysed data from a hospital database that included 3934 hospitalised patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital from April to May 2020. Hospitalised patients who received systemic corticosteroids (CG) were compared with a propensity score control group matched by age, sex and severity of disease who did not receive systemic corticosteroids (NCG). The decision to prescribe CG was at the discretion of the primary medical team. RESULTS: A total of 199 hospitalized patients in the CG were compared with 199 in the NCG. The LOS was shorter for the CG than for the NCG (median=3 [interquartile range=0-10] vs. 5 [2-8.5]; p=0.005, respectively), showing a 43% greater probability of being hospitalised ≤4 days than >4 days when corticosteroids were used. Moreover, this difference was only noticed in those treated with dexamethasone (76.3% hospitalised ≤4 days vs. 23.7% hospitalised >4 days [p<0.001]). Serum ferritin levels, white blood cells and platelet counts were higher in the CG. No differences in mortality or intensive care unit admission were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with systemic corticosteroids is associated with reduced LOS in hospitalised patients diagnosed with COVID-19. This association is significant in those treated with dexamethasone, but no for methylprednisolone and prednisone.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Hospitalización , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico
2.
Farm Hosp ; 47(2): 55-63, 2023.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2288270

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a threat to hospital capacity due to the high number of admissions, which has led to the development of various strategies to release and create new hospital beds. Due to the importance of systemic corticosteroids in this disease, we assessed their efficacy in reducing the length of stay (LOS) in hospitals and compared the effect of 3 different corticosteroids on this outcome. METHODS: We conducted a real-world, controlled, retrospective cohort study that analysed data from a hospital database that included 3934 hospitalised patients diagnosed with COVID-19 in a tertiary hospital from April to May 2020. Hospitalised patients who received systemic corticosteroids (CG) were compared with a propensity score control group matched by age, sex and severity of disease who did not receive systemic corticosteroids (NCG). The decision to prescribe CG was at the discretion of the primary medical team. RESULTS: A total of 199 hospitalized patients in the CG were compared with 199 in the NCG. The LOS was shorter for the CG than for the NCG (median = 3 [interquartile range = 0-10] vs. 5 [2-8.5]; p = 0.005, respectively), showing a 43% greater probability of being hospitalised ≤ 4 days than > 4 days when corticosteroids were used. Moreover, this difference was only noticed in those treated with dexamethasone (76.3% hospitalised ≤ 4 days vs. 23.7% hospitalised > 4 days [p < 0.001]). Serum ferritin levels, white blood cells and platelet counts were higher in the CG. No differences in mortality or intensive care unit admission were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with systemic corticosteroids is associated with reduced LOS in hospitalised patients diagnosed with COVID-19. This association is significant in those treated with dexamethasone, but no for methylprednisolone and prednisone.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2 , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Hospitales , Dexametasona/uso terapéutico
3.
Front Immunol ; 13: 909342, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1933694

RESUMEN

COVID-19 has emerged as a devastating disease in the last 2 years. Many authors appointed to the importance of kallikrein-kinin system (KKS) in COVID-19 pathophysiology as it is involved in inflammation, vascular homeostasis, and coagulation. We aim to study the bradykinin cascade and its involvement in severity of patients with COVID-19. This is an observational cohort study involving 63 consecutive patients with severe COVID-19 pneumonia and 27 healthy subjects as control group. Clinical laboratory findings and plasma protein concentration of KKS peptides [bradykinin (BK), BK1-8], KKS proteins [high-molecular weight kininogen (HK)], and KKS enzymes [carboxypeptidase N subunit 1 (CPN1), kallikrein B1 (KLKB1), angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), and C1 esterase inhibitor (C1INH)] were analyzed. We detected dysregulated KKS in patients with COVID-19, characterized by an accumulation of BK1-8 in combination with decreased levels of BK. Accumulated BK1-8 was related to severity of patients with COVID-19. A multivariate logistic regression model retained BK1-8, BK, and D-dimer as independent predictor factors to intensive care unit (ICU) admission. A Youden's optimal cutoff value of -0.352 was found for the multivariate model score with an accuracy of 92.9%. Multivariate model score-high group presented an odds ratio for ICU admission of 260.0. BK1-8 was related to inflammation, coagulation, and lymphopenia. Our data suggest that BK1-8/BK plasma concentration in combination with D-dimer levels might be retained as independent predictors for ICU admission in patients with COVID-19. Moreover, we reported KKS dysregulation in patients with COVID-19, which was related to disease severity by means of inflammation, hypercoagulation, and lymphopenia.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Linfopenia , Bradiquinina/metabolismo , Humanos , Inflamación , Sistema Calicreína-Quinina
4.
Biomolecules ; 12(3)2022 03 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1742313

RESUMEN

Severe COVID-19 disease leads to hypoxemia, inflammation and lymphopenia. Viral infection induces cellular stress and causes the activation of the innate immune response. The ubiquitin-proteasome system (UPS) is highly implicated in viral immune response regulation. The main function of the proteasome is protein degradation in its active form, which recognises and binds to ubiquitylated proteins. Some proteasome subunits have been reported to be upregulated under hypoxic and hyperinflammatory conditions. Here, we conducted a prospective cohort study of COVID-19 patients (n = 44) and age-and sex-matched controls (n = 20). In this study, we suggested that hypoxia could induce the overexpression of certain genes encoding for subunits from the α and ß core of the 20S proteasome and from regulatory particles (19S and 11S) in COVID-19 patients. Furthermore, the gene expression of proteasome subunits was associated with lymphocyte count reduction and positively correlated with inflammatory molecular and clinical markers. Given the importance of the proteasome in maintaining cellular homeostasis, including the regulation of the apoptotic and pyroptotic pathways, these results provide a potential link between COVID-19 complications and proteasome gene expression.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Linfopenia , COVID-19/genética , Humanos , Hipoxia , Inflamación/genética , Linfopenia/genética , Estudios Prospectivos , Complejo de la Endopetidasa Proteasomal/genética , Complejo de la Endopetidasa Proteasomal/metabolismo
5.
Frontiers in immunology ; 13, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1678767

RESUMEN

CD39/NTPDase1 has emerged as an important molecule that contributes to maintain inflammatory and coagulatory homeostasis. Various studies have hypothesized the possible role of CD39 in COVID-19 pathophysiology since no confirmatory data shed light in this regard. Therefore, we aimed to quantify CD39 expression on COVID-19 patients exploring its association with severity clinical parameters and ICU admission, while unraveling the role of purinergic signaling on thromboinflammation in COVID-19 patients. We selected a prospective cohort of patients hospitalized due to severe COVID-19 pneumonia (n=75), a historical cohort of Influenza A pneumonia patients (n=18) and sex/age-matched healthy controls (n=30). CD39 was overexpressed in COVID-19 patients’ plasma and immune cell subsets and related to hypoxemia. Plasma soluble form of CD39 (sCD39) was related to length of hospital stay and independently associated with intensive care unit admission (adjusted odds ratio 1.04, 95%CI 1.0-1.08, p=0.038), with a net reclassification index of 0.229 (0.118-0.287;p=0.036). COVID-19 patients showed extracellular accumulation of adenosine nucleotides (ATP and ADP), resulting in systemic inflammation and pro-coagulant state, as a consequence of purinergic pathway dysregulation. Interestingly, we found that COVID-19 plasma caused platelet activation, which was successfully blocked by the P2Y12 receptor inhibitor, ticagrelor. Therefore, sCD39 is suggested as a promising biomarker for COVID-19 severity. As a conclusion, our study indicates that CD39 overexpression in COVID-19 patients could be indicating purinergic signaling dysregulation, which might be at the basis of COVID-19 thromboinflammation disorder.

6.
Pulm Pharmacol Ther ; 69: 102007, 2021 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1267894

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: In the current coronavirus health crisis, inhaled bronchodilators(IB) have been suggested as a possible treatment for patients hospitalized. Patients with evidence of Covid-19 pneumonia worldwide have been prescribed these medications as part of therapy for the disease, an indication for which this medications could be ineffective taken on account the pathophysiology and mechanisms of disease progression. OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to evaluate whether there is an association between IB use and length of stay. Primary end points were the number of days that a patient stayed in the hospital and death as a final event in a time to event analysis. Pneumonia severity, oxygen requirement, involved drugs, comorbidity, historical or current respiratory diagnoses and other drugs prescribed to treat coronavirus pneumonia were also evaluated. METHODS: A descriptive, observational, cross-sectional study was performed in this tertiary hospital in Madrid (Spain). Data were obtained regarding patients hospitalized with Covid-19, excluding those who were intubated. The primary and secondary outcomes such as duration of hospitalization and death were compared in patients who received IB with those in patients who did not. RESULTS: 327 patients were evaluated, mean age was 64.4 ± 15.8 years. Median length of hospitalization stay was 10 days. Of them 292 (89.3%) overcame the disease, the remaining 35 died. Patients who had received IB did not have less mortality rate (odds ratio 0.839; 95% CI: 0.401 to 1.752) and less hospitalization period when compared with patients who did not received IB (odds ratio 1.280; 95% CI: 0.813 to 2.027). There was no significant association between IB use and recovery or death. Hypertension and diabetes were the most common comorbidities. The prevalence of chronic respiratory disease in our cohort was low (21.1%). Anticholinergics were the IB more frequently prescribed for Covid-19 pneumonia. Better response in patients treated with inhaled corticosteroids was not observed. CONCLUSION: Off-label indication of inhaled-bronchodilators for Covid-19 patients are common in admitted patients. Taken on account our results, the use of IB for coronavirus pneumonia apparently is not associated with a significantly patient's improvement. Our study confirms the hypothesis that inhaled bronchodilators do not improve clinical outcomes or reduce the risk of Covid-19 mortality. This could be due to the fact that the virus mainly affects the lung parenchyma and the pulmonary vasculature and probably not the airway. More researches are necessary in order to fill the gap in evidence for this new indication.


Asunto(s)
Broncodilatadores , COVID-19 , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Estudios Transversales , Hospitalización , Humanos , Pacientes Internos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , España/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA